Common sense can resolve ‘Burka’ hysteria

Ross B. Taylor 

Fanned by national anxiety over the recent terror alerts, the ‘Ban the Burka’ issue is once again causing deep resentment and concern within our community. Last week this issue reached our national parliament with the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Bronwyn Bishop banning the Burka from being worn in the open viewing gallery. It was a silly and poorly managed decision.

A very simple way of resolving the hysterical debate over the use of the Burka (or Niqab), by predominately Muslim women, in Australia is to stop talking about it.

This entire debate has been incorrectly centred on the use of the Burka, rather than about the issue of having one’s face uncovered in security areas such as banks and airports.

What has been forgotten in this debate is that the vast majority of Muslim women in our region either dress ‘Western’ style or wear a Hijab - a colourful and comfortable head scarf that covers the head but leaves the face fully exposed. The Hijab is the preferred head-dress for most of the 205 million Indonesian Muslim women to our north. The Burka is used by a very small minority of women in both Indonesia and Australia, and that is about the extent of the problem: Very small.

We should also acknowledge is that in this uncertain world in which we now all live, it is not unreasonable for authorities and business owners (such as banks and pharmacies perhaps) to request that people entering their premises be asked to wear clothing that would allow for facial identification. Entering a FIA (Facial Identification Area) as I call it, would apply to those who wear bike helmets, balaclavas’ and of course the Burka or Niqab which hides the face and prevents any chance of identification.

People who do not wish to have their face filmed by CCTV for security reasons need to make a choice of either not entering the facility, or wear clothing that allows facial identification. In the case of Muslim head-dress, a Hijab or similar head scarves would overcome this problem.

The creation of FIA’s should be at the discretion of the business owner or, in the case of government controlled buildings such as airports, the appropriate authorities.

The focus should not be on ‘banning the Burka’ as the choice of what people wear is up to them. The focus needs to simply be on people who enter a FIA needing to have their face visible for security reasons.

For the vast majority of motor bike riders and young dudes who like to wear a balaclava, the choice is simple: Remove the head cover as you enter a FIA, or in the case of Muslim women, take the lead from their Indonesian cousins and wear a Hijab, Shayia or al-Amira attire that covers the head and shoulders if necessary, but leaves the face open to view.

And for anyone in Australia who does not wish to allow their face to be viewed by security cameras then don’t enter such ‘security’ places.
Our individual rights should always be a high priority for our government, but in a society like that which we all enjoy here in Australia, it is sometimes necessary to support rules that are for the security and safety of the wider community and that can be done without removing people’s choice as to what they wear in public areas.
Just ask our Prime Minister about his choice of beachwear?

 

October 2014.

 

 

 

Post a Comment

0 Comments