"If
Abbott’s tough stance on boat people works...and asylum seekers do stop coming
to Australia...not only will Australia benefit...but the policy will also help
Indonesia."
Prime Minister Tony Abbott’s
pre-election promise to ‘turn-back-the boats’ appears to be working. In the
past month the number of arrivals at Christmas Island has virtually stopped.
During this time, it has now been revealed, some five boats carrying asylum
seekers have been either turned around or towed back into Indonesian waters.
This action has caused outrage from sections of our
community and human rights activists. If ‘Letters-to-the editor’ in major
newspapers are any indication
however, the reaction to the Coalition’s tough stance is one of overwhelming
support.
The Indonesian government’s position continues to be
one of total opposition to Australia ‘going-it-alone’, arguing for a ‘regional
solution’ with a consultative and co-operative dialog. Australia’s reluctance to
embrace this position by Indonesia has-notwithstanding the spying issue-created
the current tensions between our two countries that has seen Australia without
a resident Indonesian Ambassador in Canberra for over eight weeks.
The paradox of this stand-off in the bi-lateral
relationship is that if Abbott’s tough stance on boat people works in the
medium-to-long term, and asylum seekers do stop coming to Australia by this
dangerous route, not only will Australia benefit by then having a far more
orderly and fair system of accepting people seeking a new life here, but the
policy will also help Indonesia.
Indonesia probably has up-to 10,000 asylum seekers
living illegally throughout the entire archipelago, creating problems and
despair for these people and local residents. The asylum seekers are in
Indonesia for only one reason: To get to Australia. They have no wish to remain
in Indonesia where life as an illegal entrant can be very difficult.
Once people know there is no ‘onward’ route to
Australia via Indonesia as the main transit point, it is almost certain asylum
seekers will stop coming to Indonesia.
It is therefore possible for Indonesia and Australia
to have strong common ground on the issue of turning back the boats. So why
doesn’t Indonesia embrace the idea? It’s called politics.
In July 2012, I suggested in an Opinion piece, just
the concept that Abbott has now undertaken, but with it being implemented with
Indonesia’s support. In return for this support Australia could have contribute
to the construction of processing centres in Indonesia so as to avoid asylum
seekers ‘disappearing’ into the Indonesian community of 240 million people.
To achieve such an outcome would have taken an
enormous amount of diplomacy at a time where relations between our two countries
were ‘bumpy’ at best. The Indonesian government would have only considered this
option if they could clearly demonstrate to their people that such an agreement
wasn’t a case of the region’s ‘deputy sheriff’ - as President George Bush
regretfully called us – simply pushing Indonesia around, and that such a
program would not only benefit Australia and Indonesia, but would stop the evil
people smuggler trade in people.
So we now ‘fast-forward’ to today where despite the
rhetoric from the Abbott government about ‘close consultation’ and ‘good
relations’ between his government and Indonesia, the reality is we are
essentially ‘going it alone’ on the boat people issue by simply turning or
towing back the boats. And it appears to be working, notwithstanding the
revelation that Australia has actually breached Indonesia’s territorial waters
in the process.
The question we need to ask however, is at what is
the opportunity cost in terms of our
relationship with Indonesia?
As our near neighbour enters the volatile and robust
national election period - where political disillusionment seems to be sweeping
the archipelago like a flood - we will need to manage the relationship with
great care.
Both Indonesia and Australia need each other. Our
joint efforts in counter-terrorism has been outstanding; our
business-to-business relations, although very ‘underdone’ are strong; our joint
co-operation on regional security issues in the region are critical to our own
security as a small (by population) nation located in the middle of a very
large and emerging Asia. And in the next ten to fifteen years Indonesia will
add almost 80 million people to the ranks of ‘middle class’ and these people
will want to travel and spend money on tourism, and on better food experiences
(such as Australian beef for example) like the region has seen with the
emergence of the Chinese middle-class phenomena.
So in taking such a tough line on turning back the
boats our PM needs to ensure that he doesn’t ‘win the war’ on boat people at a
cost of the broader relationship and opportunities with Indonesia.
The challenge therefore, is for our diplomats to
demonstrate to the Indonesian leadership how such a tough stance on boat people
will benefit not only Australia, but Indonesia, and then assist Indonesia in
convincing their people to embrace such a policy without it being seen as being
forced upon them by this new Australian government.
At the moment the sole focus of the PM and his
government is to simply turn-back-the-boats at whatever the cost. And it
appears that many of us within our community feel that achieving this outcome,
at any cost to the bi-lateral relationship, is worthwhile.
Let’s hope that in five years when we look back, Mr
Abbott was right.
Ross
Taylor AM
is the chairman of the WA-based Indonesia Institute (Inc)
0 Comments
Please feel free to comment on any article. Please be respectful.